Crypto and Human Trafficking: How Corruption Helps Scam Compounds Scale Modern-Day Slavery

Cryptocurrency did not create Southeast Asia’s scam-compound economy. Corruption, organized crime, weak governance and human trafficking did. But digital finance has given criminal networks a faster way to move stolen money, obscure ownership and expand forced criminality across borders.

Across Southeast Asia, large criminal operations have turned guarded compounds, converted casinos, office parks and technology infrastructure into centers of industrial-scale fraud. Some of the people sending fraudulent messages from inside these operations are willing participants. Others were recruited through false job offers, transported across borders, confined and forced to commit crimes for someone else’s profit.

The connection between crypto and human trafficking is now central to understanding how this economy works. Cryptocurrency can move rapidly across jurisdictions, pass through large networks of digital wallets and be converted into traditional currency or other assets. Corruption provides the protection that allows compounds to operate. Crypto helps move, disguise and reinvest the proceeds.

In 2026, the United States Department of Justice said its Scam Center Strike Force had restrained more than $832 million in cryptocurrency connected to Southeast Asian scam schemes. Separately, prosecutors have brought criminal cases alleging that billions of dollars were stolen through cryptocurrency investment fraud carried out by workers held in forced-labor compounds. These enforcement actions are significant, but they reveal only part of a system that continues to adapt.

What This Article Covers

• How corruption enables scam compounds and trafficking for forced criminality.
• Why cryptocurrency and stablecoins are useful to transnational criminal networks.
• How trafficked workers are recruited, controlled and forced to conduct online fraud.
• How scam proceeds are moved, laundered and introduced into legitimate economies.
• Why crypto is not inherently criminal, and how blockchain evidence can also support investigations.
• What recent sanctions, seizures and international agreements are attempting to achieve.
• What must change to protect survivors and disrupt the systems behind the compounds.

Key Takeaways

• Corruption is not a peripheral feature of the scam-compound economy. Large operations require land, security, telecommunications, financial services, cross-border movement and protection from enforcement.
• Cryptocurrency helps criminal networks receive stolen funds, move money internationally and divide transactions across multiple wallets and services.
• Many scam compounds use a dual-victim model: trafficked people are forced to defraud a second group of victims in other countries.
• Crypto transactions are generally pseudonymous rather than completely anonymous. Public blockchain records can help investigators trace funds when agencies, exchanges and analytics specialists cooperate.
• Current enforcement is increasingly targeting the financial and technological infrastructure around scam compounds, not only the individuals sending fraudulent messages.
• Victims forced to commit fraud should be screened for trafficking indicators and protected under the non-punishment principle.
• Ending the compounds requires anti-trafficking, anti-corruption, cybercrime and financial-crime systems to work together.

Why This Story Matters Now

The scam-compound economy is no longer a regional criminal problem. INTERPOL reported that people from 66 countries had been trafficked into online scam centers by March 2025. Its 2026 Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment said that, by late 2025, identified trafficking victims spanned nearly 80 nationalities. New scam-center activity had also been reported outside Southeast Asia, including in the Middle East, Central America and West Africa.

The financial scale is also becoming clearer. The U.S. Treasury estimated that Americans lost at least $10 billion to Southeast Asia-based scam operations during 2024, a 66 percent increase from the previous year. The Justice Department said complaints to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center recorded more than $7.2 billion in losses from cryptocurrency investment fraud during 2025 alone. These figures cover reported U.S. losses, not the total global impact, and should not be treated as a complete measure of the industry.

Recent enforcement has focused heavily on crypto infrastructure. In April 2026, the Justice Department announced criminal charges, the seizure of a recruitment channel, the removal of 503 fraudulent websites and the restraint of more than $700 million in cryptocurrency allegedly connected to scam-related money laundering. By June, the Scam Center Strike Force’s published total had risen above $832 million.

On June 23, 2026, U.S. authorities seized a cloud-computing account allegedly used as part of the backend infrastructure supporting Huione Group services. The Justice Department alleged that these services helped move proceeds from cryptocurrency investment fraud, cyber scams and other criminal activity. On the same day, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed extending restrictions on Huione Group to H-Pay Service PLC and other successor entities, warning that attempts were being made to circumvent earlier measures.

Taken together, these actions suggest that governments increasingly understand the problem as an ecosystem. The worker inside a compound, the fraudulent website and the wallet receiving money are only the visible edges. Behind them may sit recruiters, property owners, security providers, political protection, shell companies, online marketplaces, payment channels, exchanges, brokers and money-laundering services.

The Background

A scam center is an organized operation where workers conduct online fraud at scale. The fraud may involve false cryptocurrency investments, fake trading platforms, romance-investment schemes, impersonation, online gambling, task scams or extortion.

Not every person working in such a center has been trafficked. Some are organizers, managers or willing participants. Human trafficking occurs where people are recruited, transported, transferred, harbored or received through deception, coercion, abuse of vulnerability or other prohibited means for the purpose of exploitation.

In scam compounds, that exploitation commonly takes the form of forced criminality. The person is compelled to commit fraud for the benefit of the trafficker or criminal organization. International agencies have documented recruitment through false advertisements for technology, sales, customer-service or casino work. After arrival, passports may be confiscated and workers may be subjected to confinement, debt bondage, surveillance, threats and violence.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights estimated in 2026 that at least 300,000 people from approximately 66 countries had been drawn into scam operations across the region. Among survivors interviewed for its research, nearly three-quarters had been recruited through trusted sources, while 79 percent had not known that these operations existed before they were trafficked. Poverty, debt, education costs, health-care expenses and limited employment opportunities were frequently reported as drivers of vulnerability.

What does cryptocurrency mean in this context?

Cryptocurrency is a broad category of digital assets transferred through blockchain networks. Bitcoin is the best-known example, but scam economies also make extensive use of stablecoins, digital tokens designed to maintain a relatively stable value, often by tracking the U.S. dollar.

The speed and cross-border accessibility of virtual assets can be useful for legitimate trade, savings and remittances. Those same characteristics can also be exploited. Funds may be sent without waiting for conventional international bank transfers, split between numerous wallet addresses and moved through services operating in several jurisdictions.

Crypto should not be described as invisible money. Most widely used blockchains record transactions publicly. What may be difficult to establish is who controls a particular wallet and how money moves once it reaches offshore exchanges, informal brokers, unregulated services or accounts registered through false identities.

That distinction matters. Crypto can facilitate money laundering, but its records can also expose it. The challenge is connecting blockchain activity to people, companies, bank accounts, devices and physical operations quickly enough to freeze assets before they move again.

What Is Happening

The modern scam-compound economy emerged from a convergence of industries and political conditions. Casino developments, online gambling, special economic zones, armed conflict, borderland economies, weak oversight and transnational organized crime all helped create environments in which large fraud operations could be established.

Some of these environments can be understood as gray zones: places where state authority, legal jurisdiction or enforcement is weak, contested or compromised. In gray zones, legitimate commerce, criminal enterprise and political influence can overlap, allowing trafficking networks, scam compounds and illicit financial systems to operate with limited accountability.

These conditions do not prove corruption in every case. But they can create the ambiguity and institutional weakness that organized crime exploits, particularly in border regions where responsibility is divided between different authorities.

How Cryptocurrency Helps the System Scale

Cryptocurrency plays several different roles in scam-compound operations. It can be the subject of the fraud, the payment mechanism used to steal money, a tool for laundering proceeds and a store of value for criminal profits.

A common scheme begins with a relationship. A person receives a message from someone claiming to offer friendship, romance or investment advice. Over time, the target is directed toward what appears to be a legitimate trading platform. The target may be encouraged to transfer money to a regulated exchange, convert it into cryptocurrency and send it to a wallet or platform controlled by the fraud network.

Small apparent profits may be displayed on screen, or limited withdrawals may initially be permitted, to create confidence. The figures shown on the platform are not necessarily connected to real investment activity. Once the target deposits larger amounts, access may be blocked or further payments demanded.

The OSCE describes a chain in which financial victims introduce funds into the virtual-asset system through an exchange, after which stablecoins or other assets are sent to a fraudulent platform. Trafficked workers may be forced to operate convincing social-media accounts and maintain relationships with targets before introducing the investment.

After the money is stolen, the laundering process begins. Funds may be broken into smaller transactions, transferred across many wallets, recombined, passed through multiple services or converted into traditional currency. Some networks may use peer-to-peer traders, over-the-counter brokers, online gambling platforms, shell companies or apparently legitimate businesses.

In an October 2025 indictment, U.S. prosecutors alleged that associates of Prince Group used “spraying” and “funneling” techniques, repeatedly dividing large volumes of cryptocurrency across addresses before consolidating them again. Prosecutors also alleged that the organization used political influence, paid bribes to public officials and laundered proceeds through ostensibly legitimate businesses. These are allegations in a criminal case and should not be presented as findings of guilt unless proven in court.

The same case was accompanied by a civil forfeiture action involving approximately 127,271 Bitcoin, valued at about $15 billion when the action was announced. The Justice Department described it as its largest forfeiture action. The scale of the action demonstrates how digital assets can concentrate criminal proceeds, but also how control of private keys and blockchain evidence can allow authorities to seize them.

How Corruption and Crypto Reinforce One Another

Crypto does not cause corruption. Public officials can be bribed in cash, property, favors, company shares or conventional bank transfers. Criminal proceeds were laundered long before blockchain technology existed.

What crypto changes is the speed, reach and structure of financial movement. Digital assets can move across national borders within minutes. Wallets may be created without displaying an owner’s name publicly. Transactions can be divided and routed through services located in jurisdictions with different standards, resources and levels of enforcement.

Corruption lowers the risk that the physical operation will be closed. Crypto lowers some of the friction involved in moving the proceeds. Combined, they can create a system in which criminal organizations operate compounds in one country, recruit workers from many others, target financial victims around the world and move the resulting money through an international digital network.

FinCEN’s actions against Huione Group illustrate the importance of financial intermediaries. In October 2025, the agency finalized measures cutting the group off from the U.S. financial system, describing it as a critical laundering node. The Treasury said Huione Group had laundered at least $4 billion in illicit proceeds between August 2021 and January 2025, including funds linked to virtual-currency investment scams, other cyber scams and cyber thefts.

The June 2026 proposal concerning H-Pay shows another difficulty: criminal and high-risk financial systems can change names, reorganize subsidiaries or move services in an attempt to evade restrictions. Enforcement against one company or platform may therefore have limited effect unless authorities can identify successor entities, beneficial owners and the people who ultimately control the infrastructure.

How This Connects to Human Trafficking and Modern-Day Slavery

The scam-compound economy creates two interlocking groups of victims.

The first consists of people recruited or abducted into the compounds. Some accept jobs believing they will work in technology, customer service, online marketing or hospitality. Others are recruited through friends, relatives or professional contacts. Once inside, they may be told they owe money for transport, accommodation or their supposed purchase by the compound.

The second group consists of people targeted by the fraud. They may lose pensions, savings, business funds or borrowed money. The fraud often depends on weeks or months of psychological manipulation rather than a single careless decision.

These harms should not be placed in competition. Financial victims deserve recognition and restitution. Trafficked workers deserve protection rather than automatic prosecution. The central feature of the business model is that organized crime extracts value from both.

Forced criminality complicates victim identification because the illegal act is visible while the coercion may not be. A person found operating multiple fake accounts or sending fraudulent messages may initially appear to be a perpetrator. Authorities must examine recruitment, freedom of movement, document confiscation, threats, debt, working conditions and the person’s ability to leave.

OHCHR reported in June 2026 that nearly 70 percent of released survivors interviewed for its research had faced some form of penalization instead of protection. It called for stronger application of the non-punishment principle, under which trafficking victims should not be punished for unlawful acts they were compelled to commit as a direct consequence of their exploitation.

How This Connects to Ecocide or Environmental Harm

Scam compounds are primarily a human trafficking, corruption and financial-crime issue. The available evidence does not justify describing the compounds themselves as ecocide, a term generally associated with severe, widespread or long-term environmental destruction.

There are, however, wider connections. INTERPOL has reported that routes used to traffic people into scam centers can also be used to move drugs, firearms and protected wildlife. It identified areas associated with scam compounds as important trafficking hubs for endangered species including tigers and pangolins.

Some organized-crime groups also diversify across real estate, casinos, mining and other sectors. In the Prince Group case, U.S. prosecutors alleged that scam proceeds were laundered through cryptocurrency-mining and online-gambling operations. That allegation does not establish ecocide, but it shows how criminal proceeds can move between digital fraud and resource-intensive or land-dependent businesses.

The more important connection is systemic. Corruption, opaque ownership, compromised regulation and money laundering also enable illegal mining, deforestation, wildlife trafficking and land exploitation. The financial tools used to hide the profits of human trafficking can be used to hide the proceeds of environmental crime.

Not For Sale’s focus on both modern-day slavery and ecocide is therefore relevant at the level of systems, not because every trafficking case is automatically an environmental crime. Both forms of harm can flourish where extraction is profitable, oversight is weak and those responsible can purchase protection or conceal the money.

Who Is Most at Risk

There is no single profile of a person trafficked into a scam compound. Victims have included men and women, students, migrants, graduates, multilingual workers, people with technology skills and people seeking better-paid work abroad.

The OSCE found that recruitment often targets people with international language, sales or IT skills. Its 2026 assessment also noted that many identified victims were between 18 and 40 and that some had university-level education. Education and digital literacy do not eliminate risk when the employment offer is professionally presented and supported by someone the applicant trusts.

Economic pressure remains important. Debt, unemployment, conflict, displacement, migration restrictions and limited access to lawful overseas work can make an apparently well-paid opportunity difficult to refuse. Recruiters may offer travel, visas, accommodation or rapid placement, reducing the immediate cost of accepting the job.

Financial victims are equally diverse. Fraud networks may target people experiencing bereavement, loneliness, relationship breakdown, financial insecurity or a desire to build retirement savings. Their losses result from deliberate social engineering, not simply greed or carelessness.

Shaming either group makes prevention harder. Trafficked workers may avoid authorities because they fear prosecution. Financial victims may delay reporting because they are embarrassed, giving criminals more time to move the money.

The Systems Behind the Harm

The scam-compound economy survives because several systems fail at once.

First, recruitment platforms and messaging services allow deceptive advertisements and private contact to reach people across borders. Criminal networks can quickly recreate accounts after removal.

Second, corruption and weak oversight allow physical compounds to operate. Converted casinos or office parks cannot house hundreds of people without utilities, supplies, security and local economic relationships.

Third, fragmented financial regulation allows funds to move between banks, exchanges, stablecoins, digital wallets, brokers and offshore service providers. The Financial Action Task Force reported in 2025 that progress had been made in regulating virtual-asset services, but significant gaps remained in licensing, registration and supervision. It said 99 jurisdictions had passed or were in the process of passing legislation implementing the Travel Rule, which requires information to accompany certain virtual-asset transfers.

Fourth, anti-trafficking investigations and financial investigations are often separated. The OSCE’s analysis of national risk assessments found that governments increasingly recognized virtual assets as a money-laundering concern but rarely connected those risks to trafficking-related exploitation.

Finally, protection systems remain underfunded. A raid may release hundreds or thousands of people who require screening, documentation, shelter, legal assistance, health care, safe return and long-term support. Without those systems, release from a compound may be followed by detention, deportation, debt or renewed vulnerability.

The Human Impact

The harm does not end when a compound closes or a wallet is frozen.

Survivors may return home with no income, missing documents and debts incurred before or during their trafficking. They may face prosecution for fraud or immigration violations, including in countries where authorities have not developed effective procedures for identifying forced criminality.

Some face suspicion from their own families or communities because they were associated with online crime. Others may fear reprisals from recruiters who know where they live. Men, who represent a significant proportion of identified forced-criminality victims, may encounter additional barriers because anti-trafficking shelters and services are often designed around other forms of exploitation. OHCHR has specifically identified gaps in shelter and assistance for male survivors.

Financial victims may lose homes, retirement funds or their ability to support relatives. The deception can also cause profound damage to trust, particularly where the scam was built around an apparently intimate relationship.

Asset recovery is therefore not a technical footnote. Frozen or forfeited funds can provide restitution to financial victims and help finance survivor protection. OHCHR’s 2026 intervention framework called for dedicated victim funds supported by criminal asset seizures and court-ordered restitution.

What Governments and Institutions Are Doing

Enforcement has become more coordinated, particularly in the United States. The Scam Center Strike Force brings together prosecutors, the FBI, the Secret Service, financial investigators and other agencies. It is attempting to target compound leaders, cryptocurrency holdings, fraudulent websites, recruitment infrastructure and services used to move money.

The U.S. Treasury and United Kingdom have imposed coordinated sanctions on networks accused of operating or supporting Southeast Asian scam compounds. In October 2025, U.S. authorities designated 146 Prince Group-related targets, while the United Kingdom imposed complementary sanctions. Administrative sanctions and criminal charges serve different legal purposes, and neither should be described as a criminal conviction.

The FATF continues to press countries to apply anti-money-laundering requirements to virtual assets and virtual-asset service providers. Its standards include licensing, customer due diligence, suspicious-transaction reporting and the Travel Rule. Implementation remains uneven, particularly where offshore services operate across multiple jurisdictions.

The OSCE published new guidance in 2026 on investigating trafficking cases involving virtual assets. It emphasizes cooperation between law enforcement, financial institutions, exchanges, stablecoin issuers, blockchain analysts, civil-society organizations and survivor-led groups. It also stresses that blockchain tools can be used to recover assets as well as trace them.

At the international level, 72 states signed the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime at its opening ceremony in Hanoi in October 2025. The convention creates mechanisms for electronic-evidence sharing and 24-hour cooperation between states. It will enter into force 90 days after the fortieth state deposits its ratification, meaning signatures alone do not make it operational.

The convention may improve cooperation in cybercrime cases, but it will not resolve official complicity by itself. Effective action also requires enforcement of anti-corruption law, organized-crime law and human-trafficking protections.

What Still Needs to Change

Governments must investigate the enabling system, not only raid the compound. That means examining who owns the land, who provides security, which companies supply infrastructure, how licenses were obtained, who benefits from rent and how funds move into legitimate businesses.

Anti-corruption agencies should be integrated into scam-center investigations from the beginning. Where there are credible indications of official involvement, investigations must be independent and protected from political interference.

Financial institutions, exchanges and stablecoin issuers need faster systems for preserving evidence and freezing suspected proceeds. Delays of hours can be decisive when assets move between wallets and jurisdictions.

Countries must also improve beneficial-ownership transparency. Shell companies and nominee arrangements can conceal the people who control properties, casinos, payment services and corporate accounts.

Technology companies should strengthen detection of fraudulent recruitment, coordinated scam accounts and services designed to support criminal marketplaces. This should be done with appropriate safeguards, transparency and routes of appeal so that efforts to prevent abuse do not become arbitrary surveillance.

Most importantly, survivors must not be treated as disposable witnesses. Screening, legal representation, safe accommodation, psychosocial care, documentation and reintegration support are essential components of enforcement. They are not optional services to be considered after the financial investigation is complete.

What Not For Sale’s Perspective Adds

Not For Sale’s work is grounded in the view that modern-day slavery cannot be ended only by responding after exploitation has occurred. Rescue and prosecution matter, but they do not remove the conditions traffickers repeatedly use.

The scam-compound economy shows why prevention must extend beyond awareness campaigns. Preventing recruitment requires safe employment, credible migration pathways, trustworthy information, stronger labor protections and communities that are less exposed to debt and desperation.

It also requires changing the economics of the crime. When criminal proceeds can be moved, concealed and converted into political influence or legitimate assets, trafficking remains profitable. Following the money is therefore part of survivor protection.

To out-create modern-day slavery in this context means building systems that are harder to corrupt and safer for people to navigate. It means creating practical alternatives to deceptive recruitment, supporting frontline knowledge and ensuring that people with lived experience help design the response.

What Readers Can Do

Readers can learn to recognize fraudulent recruitment without assuming that every international job offer is dangerous. Warning signs may include unusually high pay, pressure to travel quickly, vague employer information, requests to surrender documents, employer-controlled accommodation and recruitment conducted entirely through private messaging.

Anyone approached about an investment should independently verify the company, website and individual involved. Promises of guaranteed returns, instructions to move communication away from regulated platforms and demands for cryptocurrency transfers should be treated with caution.

People who believe they have been defrauded should preserve messages, wallet addresses, transaction records, website details and account information. Reporting quickly to a bank, exchange and the relevant national cybercrime authority may improve the possibility of freezing funds.

Readers should also avoid blaming victims. A trafficked person may have been forced to send the message. A financial victim may have been manipulated for months by a trained criminal operation. Shame reduces reporting and protects perpetrators.

Supporting survivor-centered organizations, responsible investigative journalism and prevention models can help strengthen the systems criminal networks depend on being weak.

The scam-compound economy is sometimes described as a cryptocurrency problem, a cybercrime problem or a human trafficking problem. It is all three, but none of those descriptions is complete without corruption.

Corruption allows large compounds to exist in physical space. Human trafficking supplies part of the labor. Technology gives the operation global reach. Cryptocurrency helps the proceeds move across borders and between financial systems.

That does not mean crypto is inherently criminal, nor that every person sending a scam message has been trafficked. It means the response must be precise enough to distinguish legal innovation from criminal misuse, perpetrators from coerced workers and weak governance from documented corruption.

The money trail offers a rare point of vulnerability. Blockchains can move funds quickly, but they also preserve records. Assets can be divided and concealed, but they can sometimes be traced and frozen. The same financial system that helps organized crime scale can provide evidence against it.

The central task is to connect that evidence to accountability. Closing a website or raiding one compound will not be enough while the protection, money and political influence behind the industry remain intact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the crypto-corruption nexus?

The crypto-corruption nexus describes the way digital assets can interact with bribery, official protection, weak regulation and money laundering. In scam-center operations, corruption may protect the physical compound, while cryptocurrency helps receive, move and conceal the proceeds.

How is cryptocurrency connected to human trafficking?

Cryptocurrency is connected to human trafficking when trafficked people are forced to conduct crypto investment fraud, when criminal networks receive stolen funds in digital assets or when those assets are used to finance, operate or profit from exploitation.

Does cryptocurrency cause human trafficking?

No. Human trafficking is caused by criminal conduct and enabled by factors including corruption, poverty, unsafe migration, weak enforcement and demand for illegal profit. Cryptocurrency is a financial tool that can be used legally or misused by traffickers and money launderers.

What is a scam compound?

A scam compound is a controlled location where organized groups conduct online fraud. Some workers enter voluntarily, while others are recruited through deception, confined and forced to carry out scams under threat.

What is trafficking for forced criminality?

Trafficking for forced criminality occurs when a person is trafficked and compelled to commit illegal acts for someone else’s benefit. In scam compounds, victims may be forced to operate romance fraud, investment scams, impersonation schemes or online extortion.

Why do scam compounds use cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency can be moved rapidly across borders and divided between many wallet addresses. It also allows fraudulent platforms to present themselves as investment services. Criminals may later convert digital assets into traditional currency, property or other holdings.

Are cryptocurrency transactions anonymous?

Most cryptocurrency transactions are pseudonymous, not completely anonymous. The blockchain records wallet-to-wallet transfers, but the identity of the person controlling a wallet may not be immediately visible. Investigators can sometimes connect wallets to exchanges, devices, accounts and individuals.

What role does corruption play in scam compounds?

Corruption may provide access to land, licenses, border movement, security, infrastructure or protection from investigation. Not every failure to close a compound proves bribery, but major operations are difficult to sustain without serious institutional failure or complicity.

Are people working in scam centers criminals or victims?

Some are willing perpetrators, while others are trafficking victims forced to commit crimes. Authorities should assess recruitment, coercion, confinement, debt and freedom of movement before deciding whether a person should be prosecuted.

Can stolen cryptocurrency be recovered?

Sometimes. Authorities, exchanges and stablecoin issuers may be able to freeze or seize assets when transactions are identified quickly and legal requirements are met. Recovery becomes harder when funds are moved through multiple services or converted into other assets.

What are governments doing about crypto scam compounds?

Governments are using criminal prosecutions, sanctions, asset seizures, website removals, anti-money-laundering rules and international cooperation. Recent actions have also targeted marketplaces, financial intermediaries and technological infrastructure supporting scam operations.

How can scam-compound trafficking be prevented?

Prevention requires safer recruitment, lawful employment and migration routes, effective anti-corruption enforcement, stronger financial regulation, rapid cross-border cooperation and survivor-centered protection. It also requires reducing the economic conditions that make deceptive job offers persuasive.

Sources

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Inflection Point: Global Implications of Scam Centres, Underground Banking and Illicit Online Marketplaces in Southeast Asia, 2025
https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2025/Inflection_Point_2025.pdf

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Nexus Between Cybercrime and Corruption, 2025
https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2025/2025.10.21_The_Nexus_Between_Cybercrime_and_Corruption.pdf

OHCHR, A Wicked Problem: Seeking Human Rights-Based Solutions to Trafficking into Cyber-Scam Operations in South-East Asia, 2026
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/trafficking/report-a-wicked-problem.pdf

OHCHR, Breaking the Cycle: Interventions to Prevent Fraudulent Recruitment and Protect Victims, 2026
https://bangkok.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/2026-06/Outcome-Document-Breaking-Cycle.pdf

INTERPOL, Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment, 2026
https://www.interpol.int/es/content/download/24291/file/INTERPOL%20Global%20Financial%20Fraud%20Threat%20Assessment%202026.pdf

INTERPOL, Globalization of Scam Centres, 2025
https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2025/INTERPOL-releases-new-information-on-globalization-of-scam-centres

OSCE, Following the Money 2.0: Human Trafficking Investigations Involving Virtual Assets, 2026
https://cthb.osce.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/2026/04/FollowingTheMoney_2026_screen_260407.pdf

OSCE, Trafficking into Cyber Scam Operations: Implications for the OSCE Region, 2026
https://cthb.osce.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/2026/04/Cyber%20Scam_Screen_260429.pdf

U.S. Department of Justice, Scam Center Strike Force
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/scam-center-strike-force

U.S. Department of Justice, Scam Center Strike Force Actions, April 2026
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/scam-center-strike-force-takes-major-actions-against-southeast-asian-scam-centers

U.S. Department of Justice, Huione Group Infrastructure Seizure, June 2026
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-seizes-backend-infrastructure-used-huione-group-money-laundering-services

U.S. Department of Justice, Prince Group Indictment and Bitcoin Forfeiture Action, October 2025
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/chairman-prince-group-indicted-operating-cambodian-forced-labor-scam-compounds-engaged

U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. and U.K. Action Against Southeast Asian Cybercriminal Networks, October 2025
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0278

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Further Actions Against Overseas Scam Operations, June 2026
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0538

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Proposed H-Pay and Huione Group Measures, June 2026
https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-sever-h-pay-service-plc-and-other-huione-group-successor

Financial Action Task Force, Targeted Update on Virtual Assets and Virtual-Asset Service Providers, 2025
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/targeted-update-virtual-assets-vasps-2025.html

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Seventy-Two Nations Sign the UN Convention Against Cybercrime, 2025
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/frontpage/2025/October/seventy-two-nations-sign-first-un-treaty-to-fight-cybercrime–in-milestone-for-digital-cooperation.html